Bennett v. Windstream Communications, Inc.
Plaintiff: Susan G Bennett
Defendant: Windstream Communications, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2013cv00222
Filed: April 17, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Office: Tulsa Office
County: Sequoyah
Presiding Judge: Gregory K Frizzell
Presiding Judge: T Lane Wilson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 69 OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Gregory K Frizzell ; granting 36 Motion for Summary Judgment (hbo, Dpty Clk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bennett v. Windstream Communications, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Susan G Bennett
Represented By: Courtney Jo Davis Powell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Windstream Communications, Inc.
Represented By: Michael Robert Pacewicz
Represented By: Christina Francesca Toon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?