Vaughn v. Currey et al
| Cathey Mays Vaughn |
| Jesse Davis, Osage Nation, Osage Nation Tax Commissioners, Geoffrey Standingbear, John Red Eagle Chief, Secretary of Interior, Osage Agency Employees, Robert Impson, Alan Woodcock, Melissa Currey, Paul Mays, Jr, Ernest Leroy Mays, Roscoe Mays and David Gamball |
| 4:2013cv00273 |
| May 8, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| Tulsa Office |
| Osage |
| Paul J Cleary |
| Terence Kern |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
58
OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Terence Kern ; granting 30 Motion to Dismiss; denying 33 Motion to Amend; denying 42 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 43 Motion to Reconsider; denying 46 Motion for Partial Summary Judg ment; denying 51 Motion to Strike Document(s); granting 13 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; granting 17 Motion to Dismiss; granting 20 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; granting 22 Motion to Dismiss; granting 22 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; granting 24 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (vah, Chambers)
|
|
Filing
18
OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Terence Kern ; denying 9 Motion for Appointment of Counsel (vah, Chambers)
|
|
Filing
7
OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Terence Kern ; denying 3 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief; denying 5 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief (vah, Chambers)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
