Atkinson, Haskins, Nellis, Brittingham, Gladd & Fiasco, P.C. v. Oceanus Insurance Company et al
Plaintiff: Atkinson, Haskins, Nellis, Brittingham, Gladd & Fiasco, P.C.
Defendant: Oceanus Insurance Company, Ron B Kurtz and Tim Morris
Case Number: 4:2013cv00762
Filed: November 22, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Office: Tulsa Office
County: Tulsa
Presiding Judge: Paul J Cleary
Presiding Judge: John E Dowdell
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 30, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 60 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge John E Dowdell ; granting in part and denying in part 46 Motion to Dismiss (Re: State Court Petition/Complaint ) (SAS, Chambers)
August 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 38 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge John E Dowdell Morris's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (Doc. 21) is denied. Kurtz's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (Doc. 15) is denied. Oceanus's Motion to Dis miss Plaintiff's Fraud Claim (Doc. 13) is granted and consequently AHN's fraud claim is dismissed as to all three defendants. Oceanus's Motion to Stay (Doc. 12) is denied. Defendants Morris and Kurtz are terminated as defendants. Oc eanus shall file its answer and the parties shall submit a joint status report both within 21 days of the date of this Opinion and Order. ; setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): ( Status Report due by 8/28/2014); terminating party R on B Kurtz (a Florida Citizen) and Tim Morris (a Florida Citizen) ; denying 12 Motion to Stay; granting 13 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying 15 Motion to Dismiss; denying 15 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; denying 21 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (Re: State Court Petition/Complaint ) (SAS, Chambers)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Atkinson, Haskins, Nellis, Brittingham, Gladd & Fiasco, P.C. v. Oceanus Insurance Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Atkinson, Haskins, Nellis, Brittingham, Gladd & Fiasco, P.C.
Represented By: Walter Dewey Haskins, III
Represented By: Andrew Charles Jayne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Oceanus Insurance Company
Represented By: Donald Mitchell Bingham
Represented By: John Patrick Mensching, Jr
Represented By: Stephanie L Theban
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ron B Kurtz
Represented By: Donald Mitchell Bingham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tim Morris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?