Tillman v. Neumann
Petitioner: Tashiro Rudy Tillman
Respondent: Sharon Neumann
Case Number: 4:2014cv00150
Filed: March 31, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Office: Tulsa Office
County: Comanche
Presiding Judge: Claire V Eagan
Presiding Judge: Frank H McCarthy
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 12 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan denying 9 Respondent's Motion to Dismiss ; directing Respondent to show cause why the writ should not issue and file a response to the petition( Responses due by 12/3/2014, Replies due by 1/2/2015); denying 9 Motion to Dismiss (Re: 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254 , 9 MOTION to Dismiss Time Barred Petition ) (RGG, Chambers)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tillman v. Neumann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Tashiro Rudy Tillman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Sharon Neumann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?