Moore v. City of Tulsa et al
| Jeremy Moore |
| Tulsa Fire Department, City of Tulsa and Ray Driskell |
| 4:2014cv00152 |
| April 1, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| Tulsa Office |
| Tulsa |
| Claire V Eagan |
| Frank H McCarthy |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan ; denying 37 Motion to Strike; granting 47 Motion to File Document Out of Time (Re: 36 Answer ) (pll, Dpty Clk)
|
|
Filing
33
OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan that plaintiff's claims against Fire Chief Driskell in his official capacity are dismissed without prejudice ; granting in part and denying in part 23 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; denying 24 Motion for Summary Judgment (Re: 8 Amended Complaint ) (RGG, Chambers)
|
|
Filing
26
OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan that Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses (Dkt. # 15) is granted in part and denied in part; it is granted as to defendants' third affirmative defense, and it is denied as to the remaining defenses. Defendants are to file an amended answer by August 22, 2014, that provides further factual basis for defendants' fifth, sixth, eighth, ninth, and tenth affirmative defenses, as well as the third if possible. ; granting in part and denying in part 15 Motion to Strike (Re: 13 Answer, 8 Amended Complaint ) (RGG, Chambers)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
