English v. Woods et al
| Markus W English |
| John Wood and OC Walker |
| 4:2014cv00284 |
| May 30, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| Tulsa Office |
| Tulsa |
| Claire V Eagan |
| Frank H McCarthy |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan ; granting 31 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting 32 Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot 24 Motion to Dismiss (Re: 20 Amended Complaint ) (RGG, Chambers)
|
|
Filing
19
OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan that plaintiffs amended complaint, Dkt. # 18, is hereby stricken. Plaintiff may file a second amended complaint on form CV-05 no later than March 4, 2015., striking/withdrawing document(s) (Re: 18 Amended Complaint ) (Documents Terminated: 18 Amended Complaint ) (RGG, Chambers)
|
|
Filing
17
OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan that Wood's motion to dismiss (Dkt. # 15) and Walker's motion to dismiss (Dkt. # 16) are hereby granted. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint no later than February 17, 2014. ; setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): ( Miscellaneous Deadline set for 2/17/2015); granting 15 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting 16 Motion to Dismiss (Re: 1 Complaint ) (RGG, Chambers)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
