Seaton et al v. State of Oklahoma et al
| Tosha Seaton and James Seaton |
| State of Oklahoma, Ed Lake, Betty Camacho, Melissa Jones, Robert C Scheer, Nicole Little, Relations Group Home, Mark Jackson, Almeda Evans, John Doe, Gordon David Guthrie and Patrick Adam Guthrie |
| 4:2014cv00780 |
| December 30, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| Tulsa Office |
| Canadian |
| Paul J Cleary |
| John E Dowdell |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 42:1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
75
OPINION AND ORDER by Judge John E Dowdell Defendant Oklahoma Department of Human Services' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 46) is granted in part and denied in part. Defendants Ed Lake, Betty Camacho, Melissa Jones, Robert C. Scheer, and Nicole Li ttle's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 47) is granted with leave to amend. Defendants Realation Community Services of Oklahoma, Inc., Mark Jackson, and Almeda Evans' Partial Motion to Dismiss Counts Four, Five, Six, and Eight of Plaintiffs' Fi rst Amended Complaint (Doc. 48) is granted in part and denied in part. ; granting in part and denying in part 46 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting 47 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting in part and denying in part 48 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting in part and denying in part 48 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (Re: 41 Amended Complaint ) (SAS, Chambers)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
