Caves v. Beechcraft Corporation et al
| Regina S Caves |
| Beechcraft Corporation and Hawker Beechcraft Global Customer Support, LLC |
| 4:2015cv00125 |
| March 16, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| Tulsa Office |
| Creek |
| Paul J Cleary |
| Claire V Eagan |
| Airplane Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
104
OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan that plaintiff shall file a notice no later than April 21, 2016 as to which of the options plaintiff will elect concerning her motion for voluntary dismissal (Dkt. # 99) ; setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): ( Miscellaneous Deadline set for 4/21/2016); taking motion(s) under advisement; granting 100 Motion to Expedite Ruling (Re: 99 MOTION to Dismiss without Prejudice and ) (RGG, Chambers)
|
|
Filing
95
OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan ; denying 82 Motion to Amend (djh, Dpty Clk)
|
|
Filing
75
OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Paul J Cleary ; denying 42 Motion to Compel (tjc, Dpty Clk)
|
|
Filing
67
OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Paul J Cleary ; denying 37 Motion to Compel; granting in part and denying in part 40 Motion to Compel (kjp, Dpty Clk)
|
|
Filing
59
OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan ; setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): ( Miscellaneous Deadline set for 12/17/2015); granting 48 Motion to Amend (Re: 2 Complaint ) (RGG, Chambers)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
