Rodgers et al v. Beechcraft Corporation et al
| James Rodgers, Sheryll Rodgers, Christopher Evans and Jill Evans |
| Beechcraft Corporation and Hawker Beechcraft Global Customer Support, LLC |
| 4:2015cv00129 |
| March 16, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| Tulsa Office |
| Tulsa |
| Paul J Cleary |
| Claire V Eagan |
| Airplane Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
217
OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan ; denying 89 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief; granting 94 Motion for Summary Judgment (Re: 28 Amended Complaint, 129 Amended Complaint ) (RGG, Chambers)
|
|
Filing
212
OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan ; denying 43 Motion in Limine; denying 44 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 62 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 66 Motion in Limine; denying 69 Motion in Limine; denying 70 Motion in Limine; denying 71 Motion in Limine; denying 72 Motion in Limine; finding as moot 73 Motion in Limine (Re: 28 Amended Complaint, 129 Amended Complaint ) (RGG, Chambers)
|
|
Filing
207
OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan ; setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): ( Miscellaneous Deadline set for 2/10/2017); taking motion(s) under advisement; granting in part and denying in part 52 Motion to Exclude; gra nting in part and denying in part 56 Motion to Exclude; granting in part and denying in part 57 Motion to Exclude; granting in part 150 Motion to Strike; accepting 182 Report and Recommendation; finding as moot 189 Report and Recommen dation; accepting 190 Report and Recommendation; accepting 195 Report and Recommendation; accepting 196 Report and Recommendation (Re: 191 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION by Magistrate Judge Paul J Cleary (Amended) ) (RGG, Chambers)
|
|
Filing
128
OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan that Plaintiff's [sic] Motion to File Amended Complaint (and Brief in Support) (Dkt. # 93) is granted, and plaintiffs' second amended complaint must be filed no later than July 22, 2016. Defendants may file a supplemental brief not to exceed 10 pages in support of their motion for summary judgment concerning plaintiffs' theory of product defect based on the AFM checklists no later than July 27, 2016. ; granting 93 Motion to Amend (Re: 28 Amended Complaint, 2 Complaint ) (RGG, Chambers)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
