Kloehr v. State of Oklahoma
Petitioner: Stephen Cort Kloehr
Respondent: State of Oklahoma
Case Number: 4:2016cv00376
Filed: June 22, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Office: Tulsa Office
County: Nowata
Presiding Judge: Paul J Cleary
Presiding Judge: John E Dowdell
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 28 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge John E Dowdell Petitioner's Motion to Rehear Habeas Corpus Petition (Doc. 27) is construed as a timely notice of appeal. The Clerk of Court is directed to forward the notice of appeal and this Order to the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. (Re: 27 MOTION to Reconsider ) (SAS, Chambers)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kloehr v. State of Oklahoma
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Stephen Cort Kloehr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: State of Oklahoma
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?