Pipeline Industry Benefit Fund et al v. Midwest Underground, Inc. et al

Plaintiff: Pipeline Industry Benefit Fund, Pipeline Industry Pension Fund, Local 597 Training Center, Pipeline Industry Annuity/401 (K) Fund and Pipeliners Local 597
Defendant: Midwest Underground, Inc. and Mike D Murphy
Case Number: 4:2016cv00642
Filed: October 17, 2016
Court: Oklahoma Northern District Court
Office: Tulsa Office
County: Tulsa
Referring Judge: Paul J Cleary
Presiding Judge: Claire V Eagan
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause of Action: 29:1132
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pipeline Industry Benefit Fund et al v. Midwest Underground, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pipeline Industry Benefit Fund
Represented By: Kelly Francis Monaghan(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Louis L Robein, Jr(Designation Retained)
Represented By: William Brant Warrick(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pipeline Industry Pension Fund
Represented By: Kelly Francis Monaghan(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Louis L Robein, Jr(Designation Retained)
Represented By: William Brant Warrick(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Local 597 Training Center
Represented By: Kelly Francis Monaghan(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Louis L Robein, Jr(Designation Retained)
Represented By: William Brant Warrick(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pipeline Industry Annuity/401 (K) Fund
Represented By: Kelly Francis Monaghan(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Louis L Robein, Jr(Designation Retained)
Represented By: William Brant Warrick(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pipeliners Local 597
Represented By: Kelly Francis Monaghan(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Louis L Robein, Jr(Designation Retained)
Represented By: William Brant Warrick(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Midwest Underground, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mike D Murphy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?