Scott et al v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma et al
Plaintiff: Malcolm Nigel Scott and Demarchoe Carpenter
Defendant: City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, Mike Huff, Gary Meek and Ronald Palmer
Case Number: 4:2017cv00400
Filed: July 10, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Office: Tulsa Office
County: Tulsa
Presiding Judge: Terence Kern
Presiding Judge: Frank H McCarthy
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 198 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Terence Kern , directing court clerk to take action (Re: 156 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim , 155 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim , 188 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim And Brief In Support, 157 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim , 154 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim , 153 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim , 171 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim ) (lmc, Chambers)
February 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 86 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Terence Kern ; granting 36 Motion to Amend; denying 11 Motion to Dismiss Party; denying 12 Motion to Dismiss Party; denying 13 Motion to Dismiss Party; denying 14 Motion to Dismiss Party (lmc, Chambers)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Scott et al v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Malcolm Nigel Scott
Represented By: Robert Murray Blakemore
Represented By: Josh Dean Lee
Represented By: Daniel E Smolen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Demarchoe Carpenter
Represented By: Robert Murray Blakemore
Represented By: Josh Dean Lee
Represented By: Daniel E Smolen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Tulsa, Oklahoma
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mike Huff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gary Meek
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ronald Palmer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?