Shaw et al v. Cherokee Meadows, LP et al
| Della Shaw, Sherlyne Turner, Bertha Johnson and Martha Rand |
| Cherokee Meadows, LP, Carland Group, LLC, Redbud Contractors, LLC, Carland Properties, LLC and Blackledge & Associates |
| 4:2017cv00610 |
| November 3, 2017 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| Tulsa Office |
| Tulsa |
| Gregory K Frizzell |
| Jodi F Jayne |
| Housing/Accommodations |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
161
OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Gregory K Frizzell ; denying 98 Motion for Summary Judgment (kjp, Dpty Clk)
|
|
Filing
160
OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Gregory K Frizzell ; granting in part and denying in part 93 Motion for Summary Judgment (kjp, Dpty Clk)
|
|
Filing
50
OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Gregory K Frizzell (Deadline: 7/26/2018) ; granting in part and denying in part 48 Motion to Amend (Re: 18 Cross-claim ) (kjp, Dpty Clk)
|
|
Filing
47
OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Gregory K Frizzell ; setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): ( Miscellaneous Deadline set for 6/26/2018); granting 30 Motion to Dismiss (kjp, Dpty Clk)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER by Chief Judge Gregory K Frizzell ; OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Gregory K Frizzell ; granting in part and denying in part 11 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (lah, Chambers)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
