A. Bors Properties, LLC v Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London Subscribing to Policy No. MPL1442964.15
Plaintiff: A. Bors Properties, LLC
Defendant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London Subscribing to Policy No. MPL1442964.15
Case Number: 4:2017cv00671
Filed: December 13, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Office: Tulsa Office
County: Tulsa
Presiding Judge: Gregory K Frizzell
Presiding Judge: Frank H McCarthy
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: A. Bors Properties, LLC v Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London Subscribing to Policy No. MPL1442964.15
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: A. Bors Properties, LLC
Represented By: Don William Danz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London Subscribing to Policy No. MPL1442964.15
Represented By: Margaret Mary Clarke
Represented By: Wade Caven Crosnoe
Represented By: Linda Szuhy Ressetar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?