Patterson v. Bryant
Petitioner: Brian Wayne Patterson
Respondent: Jason Bryant
Case Number: 4:2018cv00153
Filed: March 19, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Office: Tulsa Office
County: Alfalfa
Presiding Judge: Gregory K Frizzell
Presiding Judge: Jodi F Jayne
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 31, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 31 OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Gregory K Frizzell ; staying case; adding party Rick Whitten terminating party Jason Bryant (Warden) ; granting 19 Motion to Stay; denying 21 Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot 25 Motion to Stay; finding as moot 28 Motion to Stay (kjp, Dpty Clk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Patterson v. Bryant
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Brian Wayne Patterson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jason Bryant
Represented By: Matthew D Haire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?