Parga et al v. Tulsa County et al
| Michael Parga, Richard Feltz, Tara O'Donley and Christopher Wood |
| Tulsa County, Vic Regalado, Terry H Bitting, Tammy Bruce, Martha Rupp Carter, Stephen R Clark, Theresa Dreiling, Owen Evens, James W Keeley, Deborah Ludi Leitch, J Anthony Miller, Dawn Moody, Millie Otey, Kirsten Pace, April Seibert, Clifford Smith, Sarah Smith and William Musseman |
| 4:2018cv00298 |
| June 6, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| Tulsa Office |
| Tulsa |
| Claire V Eagan |
| Jodi F Jayne |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
256
OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jodi F Jayne ; setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): ( Motion Hearing set for 3/10/2021 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Jodi F Jayne); granting in part and denying in part 224 Motion to Amend; finding as moot 225 Motion to Intervene (Re: 210 MOTION to Compel Compliance with a Subpoena and Opening Brief in Support of Motion, 235 MOTION for Protective Order ) (sdc, Dpty Clk)
|
|
Filing
191
OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan ; denying 158 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; finding as moot 159 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (RGG, Chambers)
|
|
Filing
183
OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jodi F Jayne ; granting 89 Motion for Protective Order; granting in part and denying in part 90 Motion for Protective Order; granting in part and denying in part 96 Motion for Protective Order ; granting in part and denying in part 97 Motion for Protective Order; granting in part and denying in part 98 Motion for Protective Order; granting in part and denying in part 99 Motion for Protective Order; granting in part and denying in part 100 Motion to Quash; granting in part and denying in part 101 Motion to Quash (sdc, Dpty Clk)
|
|
Filing
174
OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan - Defendant state judges' motion to dismiss plaintiffs O'Donley and Wood's claims (Dkt. # 76) is granted, and plaintiff O'Donley's and Wood's claims are dismissed with out prejudice. Michael Parga is terminated as a party plaintiff. Plaintiffs O'Donley and Wood are terminated as parties unless and until they enter an appearance through counsel. Richard Feltz remains as the only named plaintiff. The parties are directed to modify the case caption in future pleadings to comply with this Opinion and Order. ; terminating party Christopher Wood (on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated), Tara O'Donley and Michael Parga ; granting [7 6] Motion to Dismiss Party (Re: 87 Suggestion of Death, 76 MOTION to Dismiss Party Tara O'Donley and Christopher Wood and Brief in Support, 74 Minute Order,, Adding/Terminating Attorney(s),,,, Ruling on Motion to Withdraw Attorney(s), 32 Amended Complaint, 75 Minute Order,,, Adding/Terminating Attorney(s),,,,,, Ruling on Motion to Withdraw Attorney(s),, ) (RGG, Chambers)
|
|
Filing
61
OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan - Defendants' motion (Dkt. # 55) to stay proceedings until the end of the current legislative session or until Senate Bill 252 is signed into law, whichever occurs first, is granted, and this matter is stayed. The parties shall file a notice in this Court within three (3) days of the end of the Oklahoma legislative session, or the signing into law of Senate Bill 252, whichever occurs first. The Court will enter a scheduling order when the stay is lifted. ; staying case; granting 55 Motion to Stay (Re: 55 MOTION to Stay Proceedings ) (RGG, Chambers)
|
|
Filing
48
OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan - Plaintiffs' motion to alter or amend judgment or for relief from judgment (Dkt. # 42) is granted, the Opinion and Order (Dkt. # 40) and the Judgment of Dismissal (Dkt. # 41) are va cated, and this case is reopened. The amended complaint (Dkt. # 32), the motion for class certification (Dkt. # 3), and the motion to dismiss (Dkt. # 24) are reinstated. Defendants' motion to dismiss (Dkt. # 24) is granted in part and denied in part as follows: Count One - The motion is granted as to defendants Tulsa County Special Judges Terry H. Bitting, Tammy Bruce, Owen Evens, James W. Keeley, J. Anthony Miller, Dawn Moody, Kirsten Pace, April Seibert, Sarah Smith, Martha Rupp Carter, Stephen R. Clark, Theresa Dreiling, Deborah Ludi Leitch, Millie Otey, and Clifford Smith for lack of Article III standing. The motion is denied as to defendant Tulsa County District Judge William Musseman. Count Two - The motio n is denied as to all defendants, subject to plaintiffs' limitation on the type of relief sought against defendant special judges only (i.e., declaratory relief only), as discussed herein. Count Three - The motion is granted as to all defendant s. ; reopening case; vacating/setting aside order(s); reinstating document(s); granting 42 Motion to Reconsider; granting 42 Motion to Alter Order/Judgment (Re: 40 Opinion and Order,,,, Ruling on Motion to Dismiss,, Ruling on Motion for Class Action Certification, 41 Judgment,, Dismissing/Terminating Case, 3 MOTION for Class Action Certification , 24 MOTION to Dismiss , 42 MOTION to Reconsider Order and Judgment Dismissing Case as Moot and Denying Class Certification Motion MOTION to Alter Order/Judgment , 32 Amended Complaint, ) (Documents Terminated: 41 Judgment,, Dismissing/Terminating Case, 40 Opinion and Order,,,, Ruling on Motion to Dismiss,, Ruling on Motion for Class Action Certification, ) (RGG, Chambers)
|
|
Filing
40
OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan that moving defendants' motion to dismiss (Dkt. # 24) is declared moot. Plaintiffs' motion for class certification (Dkt. # 3) is declared moot. Plaintiffs' amended complaint (Dkt. # 32) is dismissed without prejudice as moot. ; finding as moot 24 Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot 3 Motion for Class Action Certification (Re: 32 Amended Complaint, ) (RGG, Chambers)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
