Sowell v. Bourn & Koch, Inc. et al
Joseph A Sowell |
Bourn & Koch, Inc. and Jones & Lamson Machine Company |
4:2018cv00320 |
June 18, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
Tulsa Office |
Wagoner |
Frank H McCarthy |
James H Payne |
Personal Injury- Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 46 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan defendant Bourn & Koch, Inc.'s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. # 25) is granted, and judgment shall be entered for Bourn & Koch, Inc. The motions in limine (Dkt. ## 37, 38, 39) ar e moot. Within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order, Sowell shall file a return of service or show good cause for failure to serve defendant Jones & Lamson, or the case will be dismissed without prejudice against defendant Jones & Lamson ; setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): ( Miscellaneous Deadline set for 8/29/2019); finding as moot 37 Motion in Limine; finding as moot 38 Motion in Limine; finding as moot 39 Motion in Limine; granting 25 Motion for Summary Judgment (crp, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 33 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan (see this Opinion and Order for specific instructions) ; granting 28 Motion to Supplement (Re: 28 First MOTION to Supplement , 26 Response in Opposition to Motion, 25 MOTION for Summary Judgment ) (RGG, Chambers) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.