Ubiquitous Connectivity, LP v. Central Security Group - Nationwide, Inc.
Plaintiff: Ubiquitous Connectivity, LP
Defendant: Central Security Group - Nationwide, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2018cv00368
Filed: July 17, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Office: Tulsa Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: John E Dowdell
Referring Judge: Frank H McCarthy
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER by Judge John E Dowdell The Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice (Doc. 8) is granted. Attorneys James F. McDonough, III, Jonathan R. Miller and Travis E. Lynch may appear in this matter on behalf of the plaintiff. ; granting #8 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (SAS, Chambers)
July 19, 2018 Filing 8 MOTION for Attorney(s) James F. McDonough, III, Jonathan R. Miller, Travis E. Lynch to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $150 PHV fee; receipt number 1085-1939050) by Ubiquitous Connectivity, LP (With attachments) (Taylor, Chad)
July 18, 2018 Filing 7 REPORT on Copyrights/Patents/Trademarks (jln, Dpty Clk)
July 17, 2018 Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk , directing Ubiquitous Connectivity, LP to file a Corporate Disclosure Statement pursuant to FRCvP 7.1 within seven (7) days of this order, if they have not already done so. The parties shall use the form entitled Corporate Disclosure Statement available on the Courts website (please do not refile if already filed on non-court form unless directed to do so). If you have already filed your Corporate Disclosure Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Corporate Disclosure Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires. (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (jln, Dpty Clk)
July 17, 2018 Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued by Court Clerk as to Central Security Group - Nationwide, Inc. (sc, Dpty Clk)
July 17, 2018 Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Ubiquitous Connectivity, LP (Taylor, Chad)
July 17, 2018 Filing 3 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Chad Christopher Taylor on behalf of Ubiquitous Connectivity, LP (Taylor, Chad)
July 17, 2018 Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Central Security Group - Nationwide, Inc. (paid $400 filing fee; receipt number 1085-1938450) by Ubiquitous Connectivity, LP (With attachments) (Taylor, Chad)
July 17, 2018 Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Ubiquitous Connectivity, LP (Taylor, Chad)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ubiquitous Connectivity, LP v. Central Security Group - Nationwide, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Central Security Group - Nationwide, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ubiquitous Connectivity, LP
Represented By: James F McDonough
Represented By: Travis E Lynch
Represented By: Chad Christopher Taylor
Represented By: Jonathan R Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?