McKnight v. Brower et al
| Syretta McKnight |
| Danny E Brower and ACME Truck Line, Inc. |
| 4:2018cv00373 |
| July 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| Tulsa Office |
| Tulsa |
| Gregory K Frizzell |
| Frank H McCarthy |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***Civil Case Terminated (see document number #15 ) (sac-qc, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 15 STIPULATION of Dismissal, closing case, by ACME Truck Line, Inc., Danny E Brower (Leach, William) |
Filing 14
ORDER by Chief Judge Gregory K Frizzell ; terminating attorney Tony Wayne Edwards and Matthew Patterson ; granting #12 Motion to Withdraw Attorney(s) (kjp, Dpty Clk)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Settlement by ACME Truck Line, Inc., Danny E Brower (Leach, William) |
| Filing 12 First MOTION to Withdraw Attorney(s) Tony W. Edwards and Matthew B. Patterson by Syretta McKnight (Edwards, Tony) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER with Jury Demand (Re: State Court Petition/Complaint ) by ACME Truck Line, Inc. (Leach, William) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER with Jury Demand (Re: State Court Petition/Complaint ) by Danny E Brower (Leach, William) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER by Chief Judge Gregory K Frizzell , directing parties to file joint status report ( Status Report due by 8/10/2018) (kjp, Dpty Clk)
|
| Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk , directing Matthew Patterson to file by August 10, 2018 a Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice per Local Civil Rule 83.2. Additionally, if you intend to practice in this district in the future and want to become a member of this district, please submit an application for attorney admission. (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (eaw, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk , directing ACME Truck Line, Inc. to file a Corporate Disclosure Statement pursuant to FRCvP 7.1 within seven (7) days of this order, if they have not already done so. The parties shall use the form entitled Corporate Disclosure Statement available on the Courts website (please do not refile if already filed on non-court form unless directed to do so). If you have already filed your Corporate Disclosure Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Corporate Disclosure Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires. (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (jln, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by ACME Truck Line, Inc. (Dickerson, Jessica) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Jessica Lynn Dickerson on behalf of ACME Truck Line, Inc., Danny E Brower (Dickerson, Jessica) |
| Filing 4 STATUS REPORT on Removed Action by ACME Truck Line, Inc., Danny E Brower (Leach, William) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Removal with Jury Demand from Tulsa County District Court, case number CJ-2018-2648 (paid $400 filing fee; receipt number 1085-1939306) by ACME Truck Line, Inc., Danny E Brower (With attachments) (Leach, William) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by William Suttle Leach on behalf of ACME Truck Line, Inc., Danny E Brower (Leach, William) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by ACME Truck Line, Inc., Danny E Brower (Leach, William) |
| PETITION/COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed in State Court against All Defendants by Syretta McKnight (jln, Dpty Clk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
