Protective Insurance Company v. Larry Williams Trucking, LLC
| Protective Insurance Company |
| Larry Williams Trucking, LLC |
| 4:2018cv00415 |
| August 13, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| Tulsa Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| John E Dowdell |
| Jodi F Jayne |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
MINUTE ORDER by Judge John E Dowdell The Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Ryan L. Woody (Doc. 7) is granted. Mr. Woody may appear in this matter on behalf of the Plaintiff. ; granting #7 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (SAS, Chambers)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Attorney(s) Ryan L. Woody to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $50 PHV fee; receipt number 1085-1951522) by Protective Insurance Company (With attachments) (Ah Loy, Alexandra) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Stephen A Smith on behalf of Protective Insurance Company (Smith, Stephen) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued by Court Clerk as to Larry Williams Trucking, LLC (jln, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk , directing Protective Insurance Company to file a Corporate Disclosure Statement pursuant to FRCvP 7.1 within seven (7) days of this order, if they have not already done so. The parties shall use the form entitled Corporate Disclosure Statement available on the Courts website (please do not refile if already filed on non-court form unless directed to do so). If you have already filed your Corporate Disclosure Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Corporate Disclosure Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires. (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (jln, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT (identifying: Corporate Parent Baldwin & Lyons, Inc. for Protective Insurance Company) by Protective Insurance Company (Smith, Stephen) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Larry Williams Trucking, LLC (paid $400 filing fee; receipt number 1085-1947186) by Protective Insurance Company (Smith, Stephen) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Protective Insurance Company [Note: Attorney Stephen A Smith added to party Protective Insurance Company(pty:pla).] (Smith, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Protective Insurance Company v. Larry Williams Trucking, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Larry Williams Trucking, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Protective Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Stephen A Smith |
| Represented By: | Alexandra Gabrielle Ah Loy |
| Represented By: | Ryan L Woody |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
