Barnett v. Tulsa Community College et al
| Christopher Barnett |
| Tulsa Community College, Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education and Lauren Brookey |
| 4:2018cv00456 |
| August 31, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| John E Dowdell |
| Claire V Eagan |
| Frank H McCarthy |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk re: Remand (sac-qc, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 18
OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan that the Court Clerk is directed to remand this action to the District Court of Tulsa County ; remanding case (terminates case) ; granting #12 Motion to Remand (Re: #4 Amended Notice of Removal, #12 MOTION to Remand , #1 Notice of Removal, ) (RGG, Chambers)
|
| ***Civil Case Terminated (see document number #18 ) (sac-qc, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 17 WAIVER of reply (Re: #16 Response in Opposition to Motion ) by Christopher Barnett (McHugh, Brendan) |
| Filing 16 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion (Re: #12 MOTION to Remand ) by Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education, Tulsa Community College ; (Joseph, Jeb) |
| Filing 15 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Lauren Brookey, Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education, Tulsa Community College (Singer, Desiree) |
| Filing 14 STATUS REPORT by Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education, Tulsa Community College (Singer, Desiree) |
| Filing 13 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk , directing Tulsa Community College, Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education to file a Corporate Disclosure Statement pursuant to FRCvP 7.1 within seven (7) days of this order, if they have not already done so. The parties shall use the form entitled Corporate Disclosure Statement available on the Courts website (please do not refile if already filed on non-court form unless directed to do so). If you have already filed your Corporate Disclosure Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Corporate Disclosure Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires. (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (dlg, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Remand by Christopher Barnett (With attachments) (McHugh, Brendan) |
|
Filing 11
MINUTE ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan , : Counsel for Tulsa Community College and Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education is directed to provide, forthwith and in a three-ring binder notebook for use by the Court, a paper copy of the document and/or exhibit(s) as filed at Dkt. #1 . Said paper copy shall be a COMPLETE and EXACT duplicate of the filing AFTER it is filed with the Court, including the case and docket number information at the top of each page. Counsel shall not reorganize the filing or insert other separately docketed items. If a copy of a sealed item is ordered by the Court, then said copy shall be a separate and complete submission. (Re: #1 Notice of Removal, ) (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (RGG, Chambers)
|
| Filing 10 RESPONSE (Re: #3 Notice of Related Case(s) ) by Christopher Barnett (McHugh, Brendan) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE Notice of Objection (Re: #4 Amended Notice of Removal ) by Christopher Barnett (McHugh, Brendan) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Brendan Michael McHugh on behalf of Christopher Barnett (McHugh, Brendan) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk , : Pursuant to Local Rule 81.2, the removing party(ies) shall file a Status Report on Removed Action within five (5) days of the filing of the notice of removal in the U.S. District Court. The form is available on the Court's website. (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (jln, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Desiree Danielle Singer on behalf of Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education, Tulsa Community College (Singer, Desiree) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Jeb Emmet Joseph on behalf of Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education, Tulsa Community College (Joseph, Jeb) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED NOTICE of Removal (Corrected) by Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education, Tulsa Community College (Joseph, Jeb) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Related Case(s) by Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education, Tulsa Community College (Joseph, Jeb) |
| Filing 2 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk randomly reassigning case due to conflict, recusing Judge John E Dowdell. Judge Claire V Eagan reassigned to case., changing case number to 18-CV-456-CVE-FHM (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (lml, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from Tulsa County District Court, case number CV-17-832, CV-18-698, CV-18-878 (paid $400 filing fee; receipt number 1085-1955044) by Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education, Tulsa Community College (With attachments) (Joseph, Jeb) |
| PETITION/COMPLAINT filed in State Court against Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education by Christopher Barnett (State Court Case No. CV-2018-878) (jln, Dpty Clk) |
| PETITION/COMPLAINT filed in State Court against Tulsa Community College by Christopher Barnett (State Court Case No. CV-2018-698) (jln, Dpty Clk) |
| Amended PETITION/COMPLAINT filed in State Court against Lauren Brookey, Tulsa Community College by Christopher Barnett (State Court Case No. CV-17-832) (jln, Dpty Clk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
