Zemsky v. Sure Check Brokerage, Inc.
| Dima Zemsky |
| Sure Check Brokerage, Inc. |
| 4:2018cv00489 |
| September 21, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| Frank H McCarthy |
| James H Payne |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 JOINT STATUS REPORT by Dima Zemsky (Wandres, Victor) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss Counterclaim and Brief in Support by Dima Zemsky (Wandres, Victor) |
| Filing 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Sure Check Brokerage, Inc. (Re: #2 Complaint ) by Dima Zemsky (Wandres, Victor) |
| Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk , directing parties to file joint status report ( Status Report due by 11/19/2018) (pll, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Sure Check Brokerage, Inc. (Gaskins, Garry) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk , directing Sure Check Brokerage, Inc. to file a Corporate Disclosure Statement pursuant to FRCvP 7.1 within seven (7) days of this order, if they have not already done so. The parties shall use the form entitled Corporate Disclosure Statement available on the Courts website (please do not refile if already filed on non-court form unless directed to do so). If you have already filed your Corporate Disclosure Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Corporate Disclosure Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires. (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (sc, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 6 COUNTERCLAIM against Dima Zemsky by Sure Check Brokerage, Inc. (With attachments) (Gaskins, Garry) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER (Re: #2 Complaint ) by Sure Check Brokerage, Inc. (Gaskins, Garry) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Garry Michael Gaskins, II on behalf of Sure Check Brokerage, Inc. [Note: Attorney Garry Michael Gaskins, II added to party Sure Check Brokerage, Inc.(pty:dft).] (Gaskins, Garry) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed re: Sure Check Brokerage, Inc. (Re: #2 Complaint ) by Dima Zemsky (With attachments) (Wandres, Victor) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Sure Check Brokerage, Inc. (paid $400 filing fee; receipt number 1085-1962556) by Dima Zemsky (Wandres, Victor) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Dima Zemsky (Wandres, Victor) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Zemsky v. Sure Check Brokerage, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Sure Check Brokerage, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Garry Michael Gaskins, II |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Dima Zemsky | |
| Represented By: | Victor R Wandres |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
