Redfearn v. Hamstra et al
Plaintiff: Jesse D Redfearn
Defendant: Caty Hamstra and Millie Otey
Case Number: 4:2019cv00036
Filed: January 23, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: Terence Kern
Referring Judge: Frank H McCarthy
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 6, 2019 Filing 7 MOTION to Reconsider (titled as "objection to dismissal") (Re: #6 Judgment, Entering Judgment, #5 Order, Directing Monthly Prisoner Payment, Dismissing/Terminating Case, Ruling on Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis ) by Jesse D Redfearn (sc, Dpty Clk)
February 12, 2019 ***Civil Case Terminated (see document number #6 ) (sac-qc, Dpty Clk)
February 12, 2019 Filing 6 JUDGMENT by Judge Terence Kern of Dismissal, entering judgment in favor of Defendants against Plaintiff (terminates case) (lmc, Chambers)
February 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER by Judge Terence Kern ; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of Jesse D. Redfearn; dismissing/terminating case (terminates case) ; granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (lmc, Chambers)
February 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER by Judge Terence Kern to Agency Having Custody of Plaintiff for Payment of Filing Fee, Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of Jesse D. Redfearn (lmc, Chambers)
February 12, 2019 ***Remark: Copy of Order #4 mailed to David L Moss, 300 N DENVER AVE, TULSA, OK 74103 (Re: #4 Order, Directing Monthly Prisoner Payment ) (jln, Dpty Clk)
January 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER by Judge Terence Kern , : Due to the inclusion of personal identifiers and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(e)(2), the Court hereby, for good cause, restricts remote electronic access to Document #1 to registered case participants. If a future filing in this case contains personal identifiers, the Court may impose the same restrictions on said filing pursuant to this order. (Re: #1 Complaint ) (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (dlg, Dpty Clk)
January 23, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by Jesse D Redfearn (dlg, Dpty Clk)
January 23, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Caty Hamstra, Millie Otey by Jesse D Redfearn (dlg, Dpty Clk)
January 23, 2019 ***Remark: 3 USM 285's in hold tray (Re: #1 Complaint ) (dlg, Dpty Clk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Redfearn v. Hamstra et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Caty Hamstra
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Millie Otey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jesse D Redfearn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?