Stamper v. Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Trust
Plaintiff: Pamela S Stamper
Defendant: Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Trust
Case Number: 4:2019cv00329
Filed: June 21, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: Jodi F Jayne
Referring Judge: Terence Kern
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ANSWER (Re: #2 Complaint ) by Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Trust (Hillis, Ray)
August 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk , directing Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Trust to file a Corporate Disclosure Statement pursuant to FRCvP 7.1 within seven (7) days of this order, if they have not already done so. The parties shall use the form entitled Corporate Disclosure Statement available on the Courts website (please do not refile if already filed on non-court form unless directed to do so). If you have already filed your Corporate Disclosure Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Corporate Disclosure Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires. (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (dlg, Dpty Clk)
August 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER by Judge Terence Kern for Joint Status Report, directing parties to file joint status report ( Status Report due by 9/16/2019) (lmc, Chambers)
August 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER by Judge Terence Kern - Nathan Akira Kakazu is admitted Pro Hac Vice for Defendant. ; granting #5 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice (lmc, Chambers)
August 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MOTION for Attorney(s) Nathan Akira Kakazu to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $50 PHV fee; receipt number AOKNDC-2095175) by Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Trust (With attachments) (Hillis, Ray)
August 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Ray Thompson Hillis on behalf of Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Trust [Note: Attorney Ray Thompson Hillis added to party Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Trust(pty:dft).] (Hillis, Ray)
June 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Todd E Kolczun on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Kolczun, Todd)
June 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Trust (paid $400 filing fee; receipt number 1085-2070489) by Pamela S Stamper (Kolczun, Todd)
June 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Pamela S Stamper (Kolczun, Todd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stamper v. Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Trust
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Trust
Represented By: Ray Thompson Hillis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pamela S Stamper
Represented By: Todd E Kolczun
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?