Riddle v. Sotello
Plaintiff: Joby Dean Riddle
Defendant: Raul Neri Sotello
Case Number: 4:2019cv00464
Filed: August 22, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: John E Dowdell
Referring Judge: Frank H McCarthy
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 7, 2019 Filing 14 CERTIFICATE of Service by Joby Dean Riddle (Graham, Charles)
October 4, 2019 Filing 13 CERTIFICATE of Service by Raul Neri Sotello (Brooker, Matthew)
September 26, 2019 Filing 12 JOINT STATUS REPORT by Raul Neri Sotello (Brooker, Matthew)
September 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER by Chief Judge John E Dowdell The Unopposed Application to Withdraw as Counsel of Record (Doc. 10) is granted. Attorney Dan S. Folluo is withdrawn as counsel for the Defendant. ; terminating attorney Dan Steven Folluo ; granting #10 Motion to Withdraw Attorney(s) (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (SAS, Chambers)
September 16, 2019 Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION to Withdraw Attorney(s) as Counsel of Record by Raul Neri Sotello (Folluo, Dan)
September 3, 2019 Filing 9 STATUS REPORT on Removed Action by Raul Neri Sotello (Matteuzzi, Michael)
September 3, 2019 Filing 8 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Michael D Matteuzzi on behalf of Raul Neri Sotello (Matteuzzi, Michael)
August 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER by Chief Judge John E Dowdell , directing parties to file joint status report ( Status Report due by 9/26/2019) (SAS, Chambers)
August 23, 2019 Filing 6 ANSWER with Jury Demand (Re: State Court Petition/Complaint ) by Raul Neri Sotello (Folluo, Dan)
August 22, 2019 Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk , : Pursuant to Local Rule 81.2, the removing party(ies) shall file a Status Report on Removed Action within five (5) days of the filing of the notice of removal in the U.S. District Court. The form is available on the Court's website. (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (dlg, Dpty Clk)
August 22, 2019 Filing 4 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Dan Steven Folluo on behalf of Raul Neri Sotello (dlg, Dpty Clk)
August 22, 2019 Filing 3 FILING FEES Paid in Full by Raul Neri Sotello (dlg, Dpty Clk)
August 22, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE of Removal with Jury Demand from Nowata Cty Dist Ct, case number CJ-19-31 by Raul Neri Sotello (dlg, Dpty Clk)
August 22, 2019 Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Raul Neri Sotello (dlg, Dpty Clk)
July 10, 2019 PETITION/COMPLAINT filed in State Court against Raul Neri Sotello by Joby Dean Riddle (dlg, Dpty Clk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Riddle v. Sotello
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joby Dean Riddle
Represented By: Isaiah Parsons
Represented By: Matthew Douglas Day
Represented By: Charles Richard Graham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Raul Neri Sotello
Represented By: Matthew J Brooker
Represented By: Michael D Matteuzzi
Represented By: Dan Steven Folluo
Represented By: Matthew Brooker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?