Brown v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
| Donald R Brown |
| Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc. |
| 4:2019cv00492 |
| September 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| John E Dowdell |
| Frank H McCarthy |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***Remark: Case transferred from Oklahoma Northern has been opened in Southern District of Ohio as case 2:19-cv-04325, filed 09/27/2019. (sac, Dpty Clk) |
| ***Civil Case Terminated (see document number #13 ) (sac, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 13
ORDER by John W. Nichols, Clerk of the MDL Panel, transferring case (terminates case) (dlg, Dpty Clk)
|
| Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER from MDL re: transferee clerk to transmit a certified copy of the Panel Order to transfer to the district court from which the action is being transferred (dlg, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 11 ***Remark: Received Conditional Transfer Order from MDL re: stay is lifted (dlg, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 10 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT (identifying: Corporate Parent C.R. Bard, Inc., Corporate Parent Becton Dickinson and Company for Davol, Inc.) by Davol, Inc. (Buchan, James) |
| Filing 9 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT (identifying: Corporate Parent Becton Dickinson and Company for C.R. Bard, Inc.) by C.R. Bard, Inc. (Buchan, James) |
|
Filing 8
MINUTE ORDER by Chief Judge John E Dowdell Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading (Doc. 7) is granted. Defendants' answer or other responsive pleading is due September 27, 2019. ; setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): ( Miscellaneous Deadline set for 9/27/2019); granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer (Re: State Court Petition/Complaint ) (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (SAS, Chambers)
|
| Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer (Re: State Court Petition/Complaint ) by C.R. Bard, Inc., Davol, Inc. (Buchan, James) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk , directing C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc. to file a Corporate Disclosure Statement pursuant to FRCvP 7.1 within seven (7) days of this order, if they have not already done so. The parties shall use the form entitled Corporate Disclosure Statement available on the Courts website (please do not refile if already filed on non-court form unless directed to do so). If you have already filed your Corporate Disclosure Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Corporate Disclosure Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires. (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (dlg, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 5 JURY DEMAND by Davol, Inc. (Buchan, James) |
| Filing 4 STATUS REPORT on Removed Action by C.R. Bard, Inc., Davol, Inc. (Buchan, James) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by James Craig Buchan on behalf of C.R. Bard, Inc., Davol, Inc. (Buchan, James) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Removal from Tulsa, case number CJ-2019-03194 (paid $400 filing fee; receipt number AOKNDC-2105336) by C.R. Bard, Inc., Davol, Inc. (With attachments) (Buchan, James) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by C.R. Bard, Inc., Davol, Inc. (Buchan, James) |
| PETITION/COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed in State Court against All Defendants by Donald R Brown (dlg, Dpty Clk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
