Nortey v. St. John Medical Center, Inc. et al
| Ruth A Nortey |
| St. John Medical Center, Inc., Ascenision St. John and Ascension St. John |
| 4:2019cv00523 |
| September 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| Frank H McCarthy |
| James H Payne |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion (Re: #18 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and Brief in Support Thereof ) by Ruth A Nortey ; (Frasier, Frank)
|
|
Filing 19
JOINT STATUS REPORT by Ascension St. John, St. John Medical Center, Inc. (Madison, Eva)
|
|
Filing 18
MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and Brief in Support Thereof by Ascension St. John, St. John Medical Center, Inc. (Madison, Eva)
|
|
Filing 17
MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk , directing parties to file joint status report ( Status Report due by 11/19/2019) (pll, Dpty Clk)
|
|
Filing 16
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT (identifying: Corporate Parent St. John Health System, Inc. for St. John Medical Center, Inc.; Corporate Parent Ascension Health for Ascension St. John) by Ascension St. John, St. John Medical Center, Inc. (Madison, Eva)
|
|
Filing 15
MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk - dkt #7 was entered in error and is hereby vacated, vacating/setting aside order(s) (Re: 7 Minute Order,, Directing Attorney to File PHV Motion, ) (Documents Terminated: 7 Minute Order,, Directing Attorney to File PHV Motion, ) (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (srt, Dpty Clk)
|
|
Filing 14
MINUTE ORDER by Judge James H Payne : granting defendants' motion waiving local rule requirement ; granting #11 Motion for Relief (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (pll, Dpty Clk)
|
|
Filing 13
MINUTE ORDER by Judge James H Payne : granting plaintiffs' motion until November 8, 2019 ; granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer (Re: #8 Amended Complaint ) (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (pll, Dpty Clk)
|
|
Filing 12
MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk , directing St. John Medical Center, Inc. and Ascension St. John to file a Corporate Disclosure Statement pursuant to FRCvP 7.1 within seven (7) days of this order, if they have not already done so. The parties shall use the form entitled Corporate Disclosure Statement available on the Courts website (please do not refile if already filed on non-court form unless directed to do so). If you have already filed your Corporate Disclosure Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Corporate Disclosure Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires. (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (dlg, Dpty Clk)
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION for Relief from Local Counsel Requirement and Brief in Support Thereof by Ascension St. John, St. John Medical Center, Inc. (Madison, Eva) Modified on 10/24/2019 to remove filer selected in error (sac, Dpty Clk).
|
|
Filing 10
Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint (Re: #2 Complaint ) by Ascension St. John, St. John Medical Center, Inc. (Madison, Eva) Modified on 10/24/2019 to remove filer selected in error (sac, Dpty Clk).
|
|
Filing 9
ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Eva Camille Madison on behalf of Ascenision St. John, Ascension St. John, St. John Medical Center, Inc. [Note: Attorney Eva Camille Madison added to party Ascenision St. John(pty:dft), Attorney Eva Camille Madison added to party Ascension St. John(pty:dft), Attorney Eva Camille Madison added to party St. John Medical Center, Inc.(pty:dft).] (Madison, Eva)
|
|
NOTICE of Docket Entry Modification; Error: filer selected in error; Correction: removed Ascenision St. John as a filer (Re: #10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint ) (sac, Dpty Clk)
|
|
NOTICE of Docket Entry Modification; Error: filer selected in error; Correction: removed Ascenision St. John as a filer (Re: #11 MOTION for Relief from Local Counsel Requirement and Brief in Support Thereof ) (sac, Dpty Clk)
|
|
Filing 8
AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Ascenision St. John, St. John Medical Center, Inc. (Re: #2 Complaint ) by Ruth A Nortey (Frasier, Frank)
|
|
Filing 7
MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk , directing Kathryn Black to file by 11/01/2019 a Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice per Local Civil Rule 83.2. Additionally, if you intend to practice in this district in the future and want to become a member of this district, please submit an application for attorney admission. (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (eaw, Dpty Clk) Modified on 11/1/2019 - VACATED per 15 (sac, Dpty Clk).
|
|
Filing 6
ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Frank W Frasier, III on behalf of Ruth A Nortey (Frasier, Frank)
|
|
Filing 5
SUMMONS Issued by Court Clerk as to Ascenision St. John, St. John Medical Center, Inc. (dlg, Dpty Clk)
|
|
Filing 4
ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Kathryn Black on behalf of Ruth A Nortey (dlg, Dpty Clk)
|
|
Filing 3
FILING FEES Paid in Full by Ruth A Nortey (dlg, Dpty Clk)
|
|
Filing 2
COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Ascenision St. John, St. John Medical Center, Inc. by Ruth A Nortey (dlg, Dpty Clk)
|
|
Filing 1
CIVIL COVER SHEET by Ruth A Nortey (dlg, Dpty Clk)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
