Cathey v. Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County, The et al
Plaintiff: Reginald Cathey
Defendant: Sheriff Vic Regalado and Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County, The
Case Number: 4:2019cv00656
Filed: December 3, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: Claire V Eagan
Referring Judge: Frank H McCarthy
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 31, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed re: Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County, The (Re: #2 Complaint ) by Reginald Cathey (Smolen, Daniel)
January 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan that defendants' unopposed motion to extend time #7 is granted. Defendants shall file their answer(s) no later than 2/21/2020 as requested. ; setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): ( Miscellaneous Deadline set for 2/21/2020); granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer (Re: #2 Complaint ) (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (RGG, Chambers)
January 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer (Re: #2 Complaint ) by Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County, The, Sheriff Vic Regalado (McKnight, Marianna)
January 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Marianna E. McKnight on behalf of All Defendants [Note: Attorney Marianna E. McKnight added to party Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County, The(pty:dft), Attorney Marianna E. McKnight added to party Sheriff Vic Regalado(pty:dft).] (McKnight, Marianna)
January 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed re: Sheriff Vic Regalado (Re: #2 Complaint ) by Reginald Cathey (Smolen, Daniel)
January 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed re: Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County, The (Re: #2 Complaint ) by Reginald Cathey (Smolen, Daniel) Modified on 1/16/2020 - ENTERED IN ERROR - wrong PDF attached - counsel refiled document(sac, Dpty Clk).
January 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued by Court Clerk as to All Defendants (alg, Dpty Clk)
December 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants (paid $400 filing fee; receipt number AOKNDC-2143941) by Reginald Cathey (Smolen, Daniel)
December 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Reginald Cathey (Smolen, Daniel)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cathey v. Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County, The et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sheriff Vic Regalado
Represented By: Marianna E. McKnight
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County, The
Represented By: Marianna E. McKnight
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Reginald Cathey
Represented By: Daniel E Smolen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?