Stith v. Ritter et al
| Derrick Wayne Stith |
| Tulsa Police Department and Justin Ritter |
| 4:2020cv00005 |
| January 6, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| Claire V Eagan |
| Frank H McCarthy |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 JUDGMENT by Judge Claire V Eagan (JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL), entering judgment in favor of defendants against plaintiff (terminates case) (Re: #3 Order,,,,,, Ruling on Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis,, ) (RGG, Chambers) |
Filing 3
ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan - The complaint (Dkt. # 1) is dismissed with prejudice as to the claims asserted against the Tulsa Police Department. The complaint (Dkt. # 1) is dismissed without prejudice as to the claims asserted against Detective Justin Ritter. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. # 2) is denied as moot. This is a final order terminating this action. ; finding as moot #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Re: #1 Complaint ) (RGG, Chambers)
|
| ***Civil Case Terminated (see document number #4 ) (sac, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by Derrick Wayne Stith (dlg, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Justin Ritter, Tulsa Police Department by Derrick Wayne Stith (dlg, Dpty Clk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
