Rose v. Tulsa County District Attorneys et al
| Corretta Ann Rose |
| Tulsa County District Attorneys, Oklahoma District Attorneys Council and Oklahoma State Department of Health |
| 4:2020cv00070 |
| February 19, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| Claire V Eagan |
| Frank H McCarthy |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***Civil Case Terminated (see document number #3 ) (sac, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 4 JUDGMENT by Judge Claire V Eagan (JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL), dismissing/terminating case (terminates case) (Re: #3 Opinion and Order,,,, Ruling on Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, ) (RGG, Chambers) |
Filing 3
OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan that plaintiff's complaint (Dkt. # 1) is dismissed without prejudice, and plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. # 2) is moot. ; finding as moot #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Re: #1 Complaint ) (RGG, Chambers)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by Corretta Ann Rose (alg, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants by Corretta Ann Rose (alg, Dpty Clk) |
| ***Remark: 3 summons & 3 USM forms in hold tray (alg, Dpty Clk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
