White v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
| Edward D White |
| State of Oklahoma, Oklahoma Department of Corrections and Michael Classen |
| 4:2020cv00147 |
| April 8, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| Claire V Eagan |
| Jodi F Jayne |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Dismissal, closing case, by Edward D White (alg, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 7
ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan - Plaintiff's motion for extension of time (Dkt. # 6) is denied. The May 21, 2020, deadline is extended for 14 days, or until June 4, 2020. If plaintiff wants to proceed with this case he shall (1) file a second amended complaint and (2) either pay the filing fee or file an amended motion to proceed in forma pauperis on or before June 4, 2020. If plaintiff does not want to proceed with this case, plaintiff may voluntarily dismiss the case by filing a notice of dismissal on or before June 4, 2020. Failure to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice. ; setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): ( Miscellaneous Deadline set for 6/4/2020); denying #6 Motion to Accelerate/Extend/Reset Hearing(s)/Deadline(s) (Re: #4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis , #3 Amended Complaint, #5 Order,,,,, Setting/Resetting Deadline(s)/Hearing(s),,,,,,,,,, Ruling on Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis,,,, ) (RGG, Chambers)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION to Accelerate/Extend/Reset Hearing(s)/Deadline(s) (Re: #5 Order,,,,, Setting/Resetting Deadline(s)/Hearing(s),,,,,,,,,, Ruling on Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis,,,, ) by Edward D White (alg, Dpty Clk) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan - Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. # 4) is denied. By May 21, 2020, plaintiff shall either (a) pay the $350 filing fee and $50 administrative fee or (b) file an amended motion to proceed in forma pauperis on the court-approved form, along with the required supporting documents, or show cause in writing for his failure to do so. The Clerk of Court shall send plaintiff a blank motion to proceed in forma pauperis (form AO-240) marked "amended" and identified as Case No. 20-CV-0147-CVE-JFJ. By May 21, 2020, plaintiff shall file a second amended complaint, curing the deficiencies identified in this order. The Clerk of Court shall send plaintiff a blank civil rights complaint (form PR-01) marked "second amended" and identified as Case No. 20-CV-0147-CVE-JFJ. ; setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): ( Miscellaneous Deadline set for 5/21/2020); denying #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Re: #3 Amended Complaint ) (RGG, Chambers)
|
| ***Remark: mailed (by jln) plaintiff a blank motion to proceed in forma pauperis (form AO-240) marked amended and identified as Case No. 20-CV-0147-CVE-JFJ and blank civil rights complaint (form PR-01) marked second amended and identified as Case No. 20-CV-0147-CVE-JFJ to: Edward D White #405246 NEOCC BLDG 8-B-23-L 442586 E 250 RD VINITA, OK 74301 (sac, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by Edward D White (sc, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Re: #1 Complaint ) by Edward D White (sc, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 2 LETTER to Edward D White (jjs, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Edward D White (jjs, Dpty Clk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
