Midgley v. Alsip et al
| Gary Dewayne Midgley |
| Tammy Alsip and Kenneth Mason |
| 4:2020cv00163 |
| April 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| Claire V Eagan |
| John F Heil |
| Jodi F Jayne |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk pursuant to General Order 20-14, reassigning case to Judge John F Heil, III, Judge Claire V Eagan no longer assigned to case, changing case number to 20-cv-163-JFH-JFJ (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (crp, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion (Re: #4 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Petition ) by Gary Dewayne Midgley ; (McHugh, Brendan) |
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan that the motion #9 is granted. Plaintiff shall effect service of defendant Kenneth Mason and file return of service no later than 6/1/2020. ; setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): ( Miscellaneous Deadline set for 6/1/2020); granting #9 Motion to Accelerate/Extend/Reset Hearing(s)/Deadline(s) (Re: State Court Petition/Complaint ) (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (RGG, Chambers)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Accelerate/Extend/Reset Hearing(s)/Deadline(s) To Effect Service on Defendant Mason (Re: State Court Petition/Complaint ) by Gary Dewayne Midgley (McHugh, Brendan) |
|
Filing 8
MINUTE ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan -Counsel for plaintiff shall advise this Court no later than 4/27/2020 why no return of service for defendant Mason has been filed and whether plaintiff plans to attempt service. (Re: State Court Petition/Complaint, #3 Status Report on Removed Action ) (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (RGG, Chambers)
|
|
Filing 7
MINUTE ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan - Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(2), the Court finds good cause for delay in entering the scheduling order. If necessary, a scheduling order will be entered after ruling on the pending motion to dismiss (Dkt. # 4). (Re: #4 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Petition ) (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (RGG, Chambers)
|
|
Filing 6
MINUTE ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan that the motion to dismiss #5 filed in State Court is moot, as an amended complaint was filed afterward [2-4], also in State Court. The Court notes that defendant Alsip has filed #4 motion to dismiss the amended complaint. It shall be considered after response/reply according to Local Rule. ; finding as moot #5 Motion to Dismiss (Re: State Court Petition/Complaint, #5 MOTION to Dismiss Filed in State Court, #4 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Petition ) (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (RGG, Chambers)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Petition by Tammy Alsip (With attachments) (Robertson, Jason) |
| Filing 3 STATUS REPORT on Removed Action by Tammy Alsip (Robertson, Jason) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Removal with Jury Demand from Mayes County, case number CJ-19-227 (paid $400 filing fee; receipt number AOKNDC-2198695) by Tammy Alsip (With attachments) (Robertson, Jason) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Tammy Alsip (Robertson, Jason) |
| Amended PETITION/COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed in State Court against All Defendants by Gary Dewayne Midgley (jjs, Dpty Clk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
