Banks et al v. Moore et al
| John Coltan Banks, Garl Williams, JR, Randy Jack Wiggins, Thomas Lee Layton Owen, James Robert Venson Dilley, Nickalas J Berry and Robert Wesley Scott |
| Harlan Moore, Board of County Commissioners of Delaware County, The, Charles Phillip Hayes and Shelley Ladawn Mayberry |
| 4:2020cv00311 |
| June 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| Claire V Eagan |
| Jodi F Jayne |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
SUMMONS Issued by Court Clerk as to All Defendants (sc, Dpty Clk)
|
|
Filing 3
ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Ken Ray Underwood on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Underwood, Ken)
|
|
Filing 2
COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Board of County Commissioners of Delaware County, The, Charles Phillip Hayes, Shelley Ladawn Mayberry, Harlan Moore (paid $400 filing fee; receipt number AOKNDC-2227059) by Randy Jack Wiggins, James Robert Venson Dilley, Garl Williams, JR, Nickalas J Berry, John Coltan Banks, Thomas Lee Layton Owen, Robert Wesley Scott (Underwood, Ken)
|
|
Filing 1
CIVIL COVER SHEET by John Coltan Banks, Nickalas J Berry, James Robert Venson Dilley, Thomas Lee Layton Owen, Robert Wesley Scott, Randy Jack Wiggins, Garl Williams, JR (Underwood, Ken)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
