Sampson v. Harrison
Petitioner: Patrick Lee Sampson
Respondent: Sharon Harrison and Luke Pettigrew
Case Number: 4:2020cv00361
Filed: July 24, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: John E Dowdell
Referring Judge: Frank H McCarthy
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 17, 2020 Filing 6 FILING FEES Paid in Full by Patrick Lee Sampson (sc, Dpty Clk)
August 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER by Chief Judge John E Dowdell Petitioner's "motion to strike and modify" (Doc. 3) is denied. Petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 4) is denied. No later than 21 days after the entry of this order, Petitioner shall submit the $5 filing fee or show cause in writing for his failure to do so. ; setting/resetting Filing Fee deadline(s): ( Filing Fee due by 9/18/2020); denying #3 Motion to Strike; denying #3 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief; denying #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (SAS, Chambers)
August 26, 2020 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by Patrick Lee Sampson (alg, Dpty Clk)
August 14, 2020 Filing 3 MOTION to Strike , MOTION to Modify Respondent by Patrick Lee Sampson (alg, Dpty Clk)
August 6, 2020 ***Remark: mailed Petitioner a blank motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (form AO-240), marked as Case No. 20-CV-0361-JED-FHM to: Patrick Lee Sampson #263943 JHCC B1-216 PO BOX 548 LEXINGTON, OK 73051 (sac, Dpty Clk)
August 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER by Chief Judge John E Dowdell The Clerk of Court shall note on the record the substitution of Luke Pettigrew, Warden, in place of Sharon Harrison as party respondent. Within 30 days from the entry of this order, or by September 3, 2020, Petitioner shall either pay the $5 filing fee, submit a properly supported motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, or show cause in writing for his failure to do so. The Clerk of Court shall send to Petitioner a blank motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (form AO-240), marked as Case No. 20-CV-0361-JED-FHM., adding party Luke Pettigrew terminating party Sharon Harrison, setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): ( Filing Fee due by 9/3/2020) (Re: #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254 ) (SAS, Chambers)
July 24, 2020 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254 by Patrick Lee Sampson (jjs, Dpty Clk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sampson v. Harrison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Sharon Harrison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Luke Pettigrew
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Patrick Lee Sampson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?