Ray v. Social Security Administration
Steven Lee Ray, III |
Social Security Administration |
4:2020cv00364 |
July 27, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
Frank H McCarthy |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Rachael Faye Zintgraff on behalf of Social Security Administration [Note: Attorney Rachael Faye Zintgraff added to party Social Security Administration(pty:dft).] (Zintgraff, Rachael) |
Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed re: Social Security Administration Served Office of Regional Counsel 8/11/20 (Re: #2 Social Security Complaint ) by Steven Lee Ray, III (With attachments) (Parmele, Dan) |
Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed re: Social Security Administration Served Atty General 8/12/20 (Re: #2 Social Security Complaint ) by Steven Lee Ray, III (With attachments) (Parmele, Dan) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed re: Social Security Administration Served US Atty 8/11/20 (Re: #2 Social Security Complaint ) by Steven Lee Ray, III (With attachments) (Parmele, Dan) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Issued by Court Clerk as to Social Security Administration (sc, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Frank H McCarthy ; granting #5 Motion to Waive (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (tjc, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Frank H McCarthy ; granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (tjc, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 7 STATEMENT Consenting to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction by Steven Lee Ray, III (Parmele, Dan) |
Filing 6 NOTICE by Court Clerk of Assignment of Case to a United States Magistrate Judge [includes the following attachments: (1) a Statement as to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form, and (2) a copy of General Order 16-08] (jjs, Dpty Clk) |
***Remark: 3 summons in hold tray (Re: #2 Social Security Complaint ) (jjs, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Waive Requirement for association of local counsel by Steven Lee Ray, III (Parmele, Dan) |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Dan Parmele on behalf of Steven Lee Ray, III (Parmele, Dan) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by Steven Lee Ray, III (Parmele, Dan) |
Filing 2 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration by Steven Lee Ray, III (Parmele, Dan) |
Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Steven Lee Ray, III (Parmele, Dan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Ray v. Social Security Administration | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Steven Lee Ray, III | |
Represented By: | Dan Parmele |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Social Security Administration | |
Represented By: | Rachael Faye Zintgraff |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.