Dunagan v. Lehnus et al
| Joseph W Dunagan |
| Michelle Lehnus, Michael S Scalf and John Doe |
| 4:2020cv00393 |
| August 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| Claire V Eagan |
| Jodi F Jayne |
| Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan The complaint (Dkt. # 2) is dismissed in part, without prejudice, as to any Fourteenth Amendment claims asserted against defendants. The complaint (Dkt. # 2) is dismissed in part, without prejudice, as to any official-capacity claims asserted against defendants. Absent filing of an amended complaint, plaintiff may proceed only on the Eighth Amendment claim he asserts against each defendant in his or her individual capacity. Plaintiff shall be responsible for complying with the service requirements set forth in FED. R. CIV. P. 4. (Re: #2 Complaint ) (crp, Dpty Clk)
|
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Debra K Hampton on behalf of Joseph W Dunagan (Hampton, Debra) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants (paid $400 filing fee; receipt number AOKNDC-2245660) by Joseph W Dunagan (With attachments) (Hampton, Debra) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Joseph W Dunagan (Hampton, Debra) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
