Phillips v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
| Tawny Annett Phillips |
| Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. |
| 4:2020cv00394 |
| August 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| John E Dowdell |
| John F Heil |
| Frank H McCarthy |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Hunter Keith Bailey on behalf of Tawny Annett Phillips (Bailey, Hunter) |
| Filing 15 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by John William Warren on behalf of Tawny Annett Phillips [Note: Attorney John William Warren added to party Tawny Annett Phillips(pty:pla).] (Warren, John) |
| Filing 14 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Lawrence Richard Murphy, Jr on behalf of Tawny Annett Phillips [Note: Attorney Lawrence Richard Murphy, Jr added to party Tawny Annett Phillips(pty:pla).] (Murphy, Lawrence) |
| Filing 13 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Laura L Hamilton on behalf of Tawny Annett Phillips (Hamilton, Laura) |
| Filing 12 JURY DEMAND by Tawny Annett Phillips (Smolen, Donald) |
| Filing 11 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Donald Eugene Smolen, II on behalf of Tawny Annett Phillips (Smolen, Donald) |
| Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk, reassigning case to Chief Judge John E Dowdell, Judge Claire V Eagan no longer assigned to case, changing case number to 20-cv-394-JED-FHM (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (crp, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk: Due to Court conflict, recusing Judge John F Heil, III. Judge Claire V Eagan reassigned to case., changing case number to 20-CV-394-CVE-FHM (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (pll, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk , directing Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. to file a Corporate Disclosure Statement pursuant to FRCvP 7.1 within seven (7) days of this order, if they have not already done so. The parties shall use the form entitled Corporate Disclosure Statement available on the Courts website (please do not refile if already filed on non-court form unless directed to do so). If you have already filed your Corporate Disclosure Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Corporate Disclosure Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires. (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (jjs, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT (identifying: Corporate Parent Wal-Mart Inc. for Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.) by Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. (Pratt, Alexandra) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER with Jury Demand (Re: State Court Petition/Complaint ) by Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. (Pratt, Alexandra) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Alexandra Elizabeth Pratt on behalf of Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. (Pratt, Alexandra) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Mark Thomas Steele on behalf of Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. (Steele, Mark) |
| Filing 3 STATUS REPORT on Removed Action by Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. (Steele, Mark) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Removal with Jury Demand from Mayes County, case number cj-2020-116 (paid $400 filing fee; receipt number BOKNDC-2246084) by Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. (With attachments) (Steele, Mark) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. (Steele, Mark) |
| PETITION/COMPLAINT filed in State Court against Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. by Tawny Annett Phillips (jjs, Dpty Clk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
