Robertson v. Wal-Mart, Inc.
| Laci Robertson |
| Wal-Mart, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. |
| 4:2020cv00462 |
| September 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| John E Dowdell |
| Christine D Little |
| Frank H McCarthy |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk reassigning the magistrate judge in this case pursuant to General Order 20-37, reassigning case to Magistrate Judge Christine D Little, Magistrate Judge Frank H McCarthy no longer assigned to case, changing case number to 20-cv-462-JED-CDL (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (srt, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 13 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Billy D Griffin on behalf of All Plaintiffs [Note: Attorney Billy D Griffin added to party Laci Robertson(pty:pla).] (Griffin, Billy) |
| Filing 12 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Jason B Reynolds on behalf of Laci Robertson [Note: Attorney Jason B Reynolds added to party Laci Robertson(pty:pla).] (Reynolds, Jason) |
| Filing 11 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT (identifying: Corporate Parent Wal-Mart Inc. for Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.) by Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. (Pratt, Alexandra) |
| Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk , directing the party name for Wal-Mart, Inc. be corrected as indicated in the Notice of Party Name Correction. If any other party to this case objects to this Party Name Correction, they shall file a Motion to Reconsider Party Name Correction within seven (7) days of this order. (Re: #9 Notice of Party Name Correction ) (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (sc, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Party Name Correction by Wal-Mart, Inc. (Pratt, Alexandra) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER with Jury Demand (Re: State Court Petition/Complaint ) by Wal-Mart, Inc. (Pratt, Alexandra) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk , directing Wal-Mart, Inc. to file a Corporate Disclosure Statement pursuant to FRCvP 7.1 within seven (7) days of this order, if they have not already done so. The parties shall use the form entitled Corporate Disclosure Statement available on the Courts website (please do not refile if already filed on non-court form unless directed to do so). If you have already filed your Corporate Disclosure Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Corporate Disclosure Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires. (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (sc, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Alexandra Elizabeth Pratt on behalf of Wal-Mart, Inc. (Pratt, Alexandra) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Mark Thomas Steele on behalf of Wal-Mart, Inc. (Steele, Mark) |
| Filing 4 JURY DEMAND by Wal-Mart, Inc. (Steele, Mark) |
| Filing 3 STATUS REPORT on Removed Action by Wal-Mart, Inc. (Steele, Mark) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Removal with Jury Demand from Washington County District Court, case number CJ-2020-163 (paid $400 filing fee; receipt number AOKNDC-2266938) by Wal-Mart, Inc. (With attachments) (Steele, Mark) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Wal-Mart, Inc. (Steele, Mark) |
| PETITION/COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed in State Court against Wal-Mart, Inc. by Laci Robertson (sc, Dpty Clk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
