Hiatt et al v. Special Care Hospital Management Corporation et al
Barbara Hiatt and Thomas Hale |
Special Care Hospital Management Corporation, John Does 1-10, BayMark Health Services and NewVision Withdrawal Management |
4:2020cv00490 |
September 29, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
Claire V Eagan |
Jodi F Jayne |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Molly Brantley on behalf of Thomas Hale, Barbara Hiatt [Note: Attorney Molly Brantley added to party Thomas Hale(pty:pla), Attorney Molly Brantley added to party Barbara Hiatt(pty:pla).] (Brantley, Molly) |
Filing 11 SCHEDULING ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan - SCHEDULING ORDER FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION ISSUES --, setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): (See Order for Specifics - Class Certification Hearing specific date to be set by Court at a later time) ( Discovery due by 5/3/2021, Miscellaneous Deadline set for 5/17/2021, Responses due by 7/7/2021, Replies due by 7/21/2021) (Re: #10 Status Report ) (RGG, Chambers) |
Filing 10 Joint STATUS REPORT by Thomas Hale, Barbara Hiatt (Federman, William) |
Filing 9 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT (identifying: Corporate Parent BayMark Holdings, Inc. for BayMark Health Services) by BayMark Health Services (Whitmire, Lyndon) |
Filing 8 ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan , directing parties to file joint status report ( Status Report due by 10/30/2020) (RGG, Chambers) |
Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk vacating as to defendants Special Care Hospital Management Corporation and NewVision Withdrawal Management only, vacating/setting aside order(s) (Re: 5 Minute Order,,,, Directing Party(ies) to File Corporate Disclosure Statement,,, ) (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (jjs, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 6 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Thomas Gilmer Wolfe on behalf of BayMark Health Services (Wolfe, Thomas) |
Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk , directing Special Care Hospital Management Corporation, BayMark Health Services, NewVision Withdrawal Management to file a Corporate Disclosure Statement pursuant to FRCvP 7.1 within seven (7) days of this order, if they have not already done so. The parties shall use the form entitled Corporate Disclosure Statement available on the Courts website (please do not refile if already filed on non-court form unless directed to do so). If you have already filed your Corporate Disclosure Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Corporate Disclosure Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires. (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (jjs, Dpty Clk) Modified on 9/30/2020 - VACATED per minute order 7 (jjs, Dpty Clk). |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Lyndon Wayne Whitmire on behalf of BayMark Health Services (Whitmire, Lyndon) |
Filing 3 STATUS REPORT on Removed Action by BayMark Health Services (Whitmire, Lyndon) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Removal with Jury Demand from Tulsa County District Court, case number CJ-2020-01440 (paid $400 filing fee; receipt number AOKNDC-2275837) by BayMark Health Services (With attachments) (Whitmire, Lyndon) |
Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Baymark Health Services, Inc. (Whitmire, Lyndon) |
PETITION/COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed in State Court against All Defendants by Barbara Hiatt, Thomas Hale (jjs, Dpty Clk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.