Curtis v. Social Security Administration
| Kelley Jenese Curtis |
| Social Security Administration |
| 4:2020cv00508 |
| October 6, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| Jodi F Jayne |
| Terence Kern |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed re: Social Security Administration Atty General 10/21/20 (Re: #2 Social Security Complaint ) by Kelley Jenese Curtis (With attachments) (Parmele, Dan) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed re: Social Security Administration Served Office of Regional Counsel 10/19/20 (Re: #2 Social Security Complaint ) by Kelley Jenese Curtis (With attachments) (Parmele, Dan) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed re: Social Security Administration Served US Attorney 10/29/20 (Re: #2 Social Security Complaint ) by Kelley Jenese Curtis (With attachments) (Parmele, Dan) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Issued by Court Clerk as to Social Security Administration (sc, Dpty Clk) |
| ***Remark: 3 summonses in hold tray (dlg, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 7
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jodi F Jayne ; granting #3 Motion to Waive (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (kah, Chambers)
|
| Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk randomly reassigning this case upon the filing of Dkt #5 and pursuant to General Order 16-08. Reassigning case to Judge Terence Kern and Magistrate Judge Jodi F. Jayne, changing case number to 20-cv-508-TCK-JFJ (Re: #5 Statement Declining Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction (Social Security) ) (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (tjc, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 5 STATEMENT Declining Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction by Kelley Jenese Curtis (Parmele, Dan) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Dan Parmele on behalf of Kelley Jenese Curtis (Parmele, Dan) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Waive Requirement of Association of Local Counsel by Kelley Jenese Curtis (Parmele, Dan) |
| Filing 2 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration (paid $400 filing fee; receipt number AOKNDC-2279673) by Kelley Jenese Curtis (With attachments) (Parmele, Dan) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Kelley Jenese Curtis [Note: Attorney Dan Parmele added to party Kelley Jenese Curtis(pty:pla).] (Parmele, Dan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Curtis v. Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Social Security Administration | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kelley Jenese Curtis | |
| Represented By: | Dan Parmele |
| Represented By: | Daniel A Parmele |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
