Valdez v. Kunzweiler et al
| James Douglas Valdez |
| Stephen Kunzweiler and Cody Holbrook |
| 4:2020cv00620 |
| December 1, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| John E Dowdell |
| Jodi F Jayne |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
ORDER by Chief Judge John E Dowdell No later than 30 days after the entry of this order, or on or before January 22, 2021, Valdez shall either (1) pay in full the $350 filing fee and $52 administrative fee or (2) file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, on the court-approved form, along with the required 6-month statement of institutional accounts.The Clerk of Court shall send to Valdez one blank motion to proceed in forma pauperis (form AO-240M) identified for Case No. 20-CV-0620-JED-JFJ., setting/resetting Filing Fee deadline(s): ( Filing Fee due by 1/22/2021) (Re: #1 Complaint ) (SAS, Chambers)
|
| ***Remark: mailed one blank motion to proceed in forma pauperis (form AO-240M) identified for Case No. 20-CV-0620-JED-JFJ to: James Douglas Valdez #1145439 David L Moss Criminal Justice Center 300 N DENVER AVE TULSA, OK 74103 (sac, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Cody Holbrook, Stephen Kunzweiler by James Douglas Valdez (sc, Dpty Clk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
