Fort v. Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Rusty Loren Fort
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 4:2021cv00007
Filed: January 7, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: Claire V Eagan
Referring Judge: Christine D Little
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Rachael Faye Zintgraff on behalf of Social Security Administration [Note: Attorney Rachael Faye Zintgraff added to party Social Security Administration(pty:dft).] (Zintgraff, Rachael)
January 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk randomly reassigning this case upon the filing of Dkt #7 and pursuant to General Order 16-08. Reassigning case to Judge Claire V. Eagan and Magistrate Judge Christine D. Little, changing case number to 21-cv-7-CVE-CDL (Re: #7 Statement Declining Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction (Social Security) ) (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (tjc, Dpty Clk)
January 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF ELECTRONIC SERVICE of Complaint re: Social Security Administration (Re: #2 Social Security Complaint ) by Rusty Loren Fort (Harlan, John)
January 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 STATEMENT Declining Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction by Rusty Loren Fort (Harlan, John)
January 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SUMMONS Issued by Court Clerk as to Social Security Administration (srt, Dpty Clk)
January 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Christine D Little Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. Plaintiff may file this action without payment of filing fees ; granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (CDLJ, Judge)
January 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE by Court Clerk of Assignment of Case to a United States Magistrate Judge [includes the following attachments: (1) a Statement as to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form, and (2) a copy of General Order 16-08] (ll, Dpty Clk)
January 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by Rusty Loren Fort (Harlan, John)
January 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration by Rusty Loren Fort (Harlan, John)
January 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Rusty Loren Fort (Harlan, John)
January 7, 2021 Opinion or Order ***Remark: 3 summons in hold tray (Re: #2 Social Security Complaint ) (ll, Dpty Clk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fort v. Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rusty Loren Fort
Represented By: John Lowell Harlan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Represented By: Rachael Faye Zintgraff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?