Mike Hughes Architects, P.C. v Henning Paric Commercial, LLC
Mike Hughes Architects, P.C. |
Henning Paric Commercial, LLC and Mike Hughes Architect, P.C. |
4:2021cv00039 |
February 1, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
Claire V Eagan |
Christine D Little |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 MINUTE ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan - There will not be a Scheduling Order entered in this matter until resolution of the yet-to-be-filed motion to stay. (Re: State Court Petition/Complaint, #12 Joint Status Report per Local Rule 16.1 ) (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (RGG, Chambers) |
Filing 12 JOINT STATUS REPORT by Henning Paric Commercial, LLC, Mike Hughes Architects, P.C. (Ward, Jeremy) |
Filing 11 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Mike Hughes Architects, P.C. (Ward, Jeremy) |
Filing 10 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Jeremy Kalon Ward on behalf of Mike Hughes Architects, P.C. (Ward, Jeremy) |
Filing 9 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Joseph R Farris on behalf of Mike Hughes Architects, P.C. (Farris, Joseph) |
Filing 8 ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan , directing parties to file joint status report ( Status Report due by 3/10/2021) (RGG, Chambers) |
Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Henning Paric Commercial, LLC (Hathaway, Scott) |
Filing 6 ANSWER (Re: State Court Petition/Complaint ) by Henning Paric Commercial, LLC (Hathaway, Scott) |
Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk , directing Mike Hughes Architects, P.C. to file a Corporate Disclosure Statement pursuant to FRCvP 7.1 within seven (7) days of this order, if they have not already done so. The parties shall use the form entitled Corporate Disclosure Statement available on the Courts website (please do not refile if already filed on non-court form unless directed to do so). If you have already filed your Corporate Disclosure Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Corporate Disclosure Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires. (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (ll, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk , directing Henning Paric Commercial, LLC to file a Corporate Disclosure Statement pursuant to FRCvP 7.1 within seven (7) days of this order, if they have not already done so. The parties shall use the form entitled Corporate Disclosure Statement available on the Courts website (please do not refile if already filed on non-court form unless directed to do so). If you have already filed your Corporate Disclosure Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Corporate Disclosure Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires. (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (ll, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 3 STATUS REPORT on Removed Action by Henning Paric Commercial, LLC (Hathaway, Scott) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Removal from Tulsa County District Court, case number CJ-2020-2808 (paid $402 filing fee; receipt number AOKNDC-2347182) by Henning Paric Commercial, LLC (With attachments) (Hathaway, Scott) |
Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Henning Paric Commercial, LLC (Hathaway, Scott) |
PETITION/COMPLAINT filed in State Court against Henning Paric Commercial, LLC by Mike Hughes Architect, P.C. (ll, Dpty Clk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.