Jackson v. Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Alice Jackson
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 4:2021cv00042
Filed: February 3, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: Jodi F Jayne
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 3, 2021 Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed re: Social Security Administration Served Office of Regional Counsel 2/16/21 (Re: #2 Social Security Complaint ) by Alice Jackson (With attachments) (Parmele, Dan)
March 3, 2021 Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed re: Social Security Administration Served US Attorney 2/16/21 (Re: #2 Social Security Complaint ) by Alice Jackson (With attachments) (Parmele, Dan)
March 3, 2021 Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed re: Social Security Administration erved Atty General 2/17/21 (Re: #2 Social Security Complaint ) by Alice Jackson (With attachments) (Parmele, Dan)
February 26, 2021 Filing 10 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Jeffrey Andrew Gallant on behalf of Social Security Administration [Note: Attorney Jeffrey Andrew Gallant added to party Social Security Administration(pty:dft).] (Gallant, Jeffrey)
February 5, 2021 Filing 9 SUMMONS Issued by Court Clerk as to Social Security Administration (ll, Dpty Clk)
February 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jodi F Jayne ; granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; granting #5 Motion to Waive (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (kah, Chambers)
February 3, 2021 Filing 7 STATEMENT Consenting to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction by Alice Jackson (Parmele, Dan)
February 3, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE by Court Clerk of Assignment of Case to a United States Magistrate Judge [includes the following attachments: (1) a Statement as to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form, and (2) a copy of General Order 16-08] (ll, Dpty Clk)
February 3, 2021 Filing 5 MOTION to Waive Requirement of Association of Local Counsel by Alice Jackson (Parmele, Dan)
February 3, 2021 Filing 4 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Dan Parmele on behalf of Alice Jackson (Parmele, Dan)
February 3, 2021 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by Alice Jackson (Parmele, Dan)
February 3, 2021 Filing 2 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration by Alice Jackson (Parmele, Dan)
February 3, 2021 Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Alice Jackson (Parmele, Dan)
February 3, 2021 ***Remark: 3 summons in hold tray (Re: #2 Social Security Complaint ) (ll, Dpty Clk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jackson v. Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alice Jackson
Represented By: Dan Parmele
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Represented By: Jeffrey Andrew Gallant
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?