Blanton v. Howden Roots, LLC
Plaintiff: Roger Blanton
Defendant: Howden Roots, LLC
Case Number: 4:2021cv00149
Filed: April 2, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: John F Heil
Referring Judge: Christine D Little
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion (Re: 14 MOTION for Attorney Fees (submitted as part of #13 ) ) by Howden Roots, LLC ; (Lindemuth, Caroline)
May 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion (Re: #13 MOTION to Remand ) by Howden Roots, LLC ; (With attachments) (Lindemuth, Caroline)
May 5, 2021 Opinion or Order NOTICE of Docket Entry Modification; Error: this is a two part motion of which only one part was filed; Correction: efiled Motion for Attorney Fees - see 14 (Re: #13 MOTION to Remand ) (sc, Dpty Clk)
May 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MOTION for Attorney Fees (submitted as part of #13 ) by Roger Blanton (sc, Dpty Clk)
May 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MOTION to Remand by Roger Blanton (Allen, Anthony) Modified on 5/5/2021 This is a multi-event document, see Doc #14 for second event (sc, Dpty Clk).
April 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER by Judge John F Heil, III : granting defendant's motions for admission pro hac vice as to Mark Batten and Makenzie Dawn. Local counsel is directed to advise them of the requirements of Local General Rule 4-4(a) and the need to register as a CM/ECF user in this Court ; granting #10 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice; granting #11 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (pll, Dpty Clk)
April 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MOTION for Attorney(s) Makenzie Dawn Way to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $50 PHV fee; receipt number AOKNDC-2393773) by Howden Roots, LLC (With attachments) (Snapp, Randall)
April 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MOTION for Attorney(s) Mark W. Batten to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $50 PHV fee; receipt number AOKNDC-2393732) by Howden Roots, LLC (With attachments) (Snapp, Randall)
April 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER by Judge John F Heil, III : Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(2), the Court finds good cause for delay in entering a scheduling order in this case as there are pending dispositive motions which should first be resolved (Re: #8 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim ) (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (pll, Dpty Clk)
April 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Howden Roots, LLC (With attachments) (Lindemuth, Caroline)
April 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT (identifying: Corporate Parent Howden USA Company for Howden Roots, LLC) by Howden Roots, LLC (Lindemuth, Caroline)
April 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk , directing Howden Roots, LLC to file a Corporate Disclosure Statement pursuant to FRCvP 7.1 within seven (7) days of this order, if they have not already done so. The parties shall use the form entitled Corporate Disclosure Statement available on the Courts website (please do not refile if already filed on non-court form unless directed to do so). If you have already filed your Corporate Disclosure Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Corporate Disclosure Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires. (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (sc, Dpty Clk)
April 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Caroline Grace Lindemuth on behalf of Howden Roots, LLC [Note: Attorney Caroline Grace Lindemuth added to party Howden Roots, LLC(pty:dft).] (Lindemuth, Caroline)
April 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Randall James Snapp on behalf of Howden Roots, LLC (Snapp, Randall)
April 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STATUS REPORT on Removed Action by Howden Roots, LLC (Snapp, Randall)
April 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE of Removal with Jury Demand from District Court of Tulsa County, case number CJ-2021-00719 (paid $402 filing fee; receipt number AOKNDC-2385902) by Howden Roots, LLC (With attachments) (Snapp, Randall)
April 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Howden Roots, LLC (Snapp, Randall)
March 10, 2021 Opinion or Order PETITION/COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed in State Court against Howden Roots, LLC by Roger Blanton (sc, Dpty Clk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Blanton v. Howden Roots, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roger Blanton
Represented By: Anthony Lee Allen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Howden Roots, LLC
Represented By: Randall James Snapp
Represented By: Caroline Grace Lindemuth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?