Feather et al v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, London
| Jennifer Feather and Robert Feather |
| Underwriters at Lloyd's, London |
| 4:2021cv00180 |
| April 21, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| Claire V Eagan |
| Christine D Little |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Ann T Kirk on behalf of Underwriters at Lloyd's, London [Note: Attorney Ann T Kirk added to party Underwriters at Lloyd's, London(pty:dft).] (Kirk, Ann) |
| Filing 12 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Taryn M. Kadar on behalf of Underwriters at Lloyd's, London [Note: Attorney Taryn M. Kadar added to party Underwriters at Lloyd's, London(pty:dft).] (Kadar, Taryn) |
Filing 11
ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan that Taryn M. Kadar and Ann T. Kirk are admitted pro hac vice for the limited purpose of representing defendant in this matter. ; granting #9 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice; granting #10 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice (RGG, Chambers)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Attorney(s) Ann T. Kirk to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $50 PHV fee; receipt number AOKNDC-2422407) by Underwriters at Lloyd's, London (With attachments) (Maloan, Michael) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Attorney(s) Taryn M. Kadar to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $50 PHV fee; receipt number AOKNDC-2422388) by Underwriters at Lloyd's, London (With attachments) (Maloan, Michael) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk , directing Underwriters at Lloyd's, London to file a Corporate Disclosure Statement pursuant to FRCvP 7.1 within seven (7) days of this order, if they have not already done so. The parties shall use the form entitled Corporate Disclosure Statement available on the Courts website (please do not refile if already filed on non-court form unless directed to do so). If you have already filed your Corporate Disclosure Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Corporate Disclosure Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires. (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (lmt, Dpty Clk) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan , directing parties to file joint status report ( Status Report due by 6/21/2021) (RGG, Chambers)
|
| Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT (identifying: Corporate Parent Beazley Underwriting Ltd., Corporate Parent beazley plc, Corporate Parent beazley furlonge holdings ltd, Corporate Parent beazley group ltd, Corporate Parent lloyd's syndicate afb for Underwriters at Lloyd's, London) by Underwriters at Lloyd's, London (Maloan, Michael) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER (Re: #2 Complaint ) by Underwriters at Lloyd's, London (Maloan, Michael) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Michael Thomas Maloan on behalf of Underwriters at Lloyd's, London [Note: Attorney Michael Thomas Maloan added to party Underwriters at Lloyd's, London(pty:dft).] (Maloan, Michael) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued by Court Clerk as to Underwriters at Lloyd's, London (sc, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Underwriters at Lloyd's, London (paid $402 filing fee; receipt number AOKNDC-2397906) by Robert Feather, Jennifer Feather (McGrew, Michael) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Jennifer Feather, Robert Feather (McGrew, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
