Monica Williams v. Melton Truck Lines, Inc.
Plaintiff: Monica Williams
Defendant: Melton Truck Lines, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2021cv00184
Filed: April 22, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: Terence Kern
Referring Judge: Christine D Little
Nature of Suit: Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA)
Cause of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 22, 2021 Filing 25 LETTER re: Local Counsel Requirement sent to Mark S. Eisen (ll, Dpty Clk)
April 22, 2021 Filing 24 LETTER re: Local Counsel Requirement sent to Rachel Kaufman (ll, Dpty Clk)
April 22, 2021 Filing 23 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk , changing case number to 21-cv-184-TCK-CDL (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (ll, Dpty Clk)
April 22, 2021 Filing 22 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk , directing Melton Truck Lines, Inc. to file a Corporate Disclosure Statement pursuant to FRCvP 7.1 within seven (7) days of this order, if they have not already done so. The parties shall use the form entitled Corporate Disclosure Statement available on the Courts website (please do not refile if already filed on non-court form unless directed to do so). If you have already filed your Corporate Disclosure Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Corporate Disclosure Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires. (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (ll, Dpty Clk)
April 22, 2021 Filing 21 CASE TRANSFERRED IN from California Central
April 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 20 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE MOTION TO TRANSFER TO THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA (DKT. 11) by Judge John A. Kronstadt. MD JS-6. Case Terminated. (lom) [Transferred from California Central on 4/22/2021.]
April 22, 2021 Filing 19 NOTICE OF NON-OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Transfer Case to Northern District of Oklahoma #11 filed by Plaintiff Monica Williams. (Kaufman, Rachel) [Transferred from California Central on 4/22/2021.]
April 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 18 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE MOTION TO TRANSFER TO THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA (DKT. #11 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt: Pursuant to the Standing Orders (Dkt. #8 ), any opposition to Defendant's Motion to Transfer to the Northern District of Oklahoma (the "Motion" (Dkt. #11 )) was due within 21 days of the filing of the Motion. No opposition was timely filed, as noted by Defendant's "Reply and Notice of Failure to Oppose in Support of Its Motion to Transfer to the Northern District of Oklahoma." Dkt. 16. Pursuant to L.R. 7-12, the failure to file an opposition may be deemed consent to the relief sought in the Motion. However, Plaintiff will be provided a final opportunity to file an opposition to the Motion, with any such opposition filed on or before May 4, 2021. If Plaintiff files such an opposition, Plaintiff's counsel shall also file a declaration stating the reason that the opposition was not timely filed in accordance with the Standing Order. If Plaintiff files an opposition, any reply shall be filed by Defendant on or before May 18, 2021. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jaklc2) TEXT ONLY ENTRY [Transferred from California Central on 4/22/2021.]
April 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b)/26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Counsel shall file a Joint Report consistent with this Order. A hearing is not necessary and, therefore, the matter is taken under submission. Upon review of the Joint Report, a scheduling order will be issued. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 9/17/2021. See order for complete details. (jre) [Transferred from California Central on 4/22/2021.]
April 16, 2021 Filing 16 REPLY in Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Transfer Case to Northern District of Oklahoma #11 and Notice of Failure to Oppose filed by Defendant Melton Truck Lines, Inc.. (Eisen, Mark) [Transferred from California Central on 4/22/2021.]
April 16, 2021 Filing 15 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND and Affirmative Defenses filed by Defendant Melton Truck Lines, Inc..(Eisen, Mark) [Transferred from California Central on 4/22/2021.]
March 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON MELTON TRUCK LINE'S MOTION TO TRANSFER TO THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA (DKT. #11 ) by Judge John A Kronstadt: Defendant has set the motion for a day the Court's calendar is full and, therefore, closed. The Court, on its own motion, continues the Motion from July 26, 2021 to August 30, 2021 at 8:30 a.m. Counsel shall refer to the Court's Standing Order with respect to the briefing schedule of motions. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (tj) TEXT ONLY ENTRY [Transferred from California Central on 4/22/2021.]
March 22, 2021 Filing 13 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Transfer Case to Northern District of Oklahoma #11 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment. Other error(s) with document(s): No [Prop] Order attached. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lom) [Transferred from California Central on 4/22/2021.]
March 19, 2021 Filing 12 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Melton Truck Lines, Inc. identifying The Hawthorn Group Inc. as Corporate Parent. (Eisen, Mark) [Transferred from California Central on 4/22/2021.]
March 19, 2021 Filing 11 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Transfer Case to Northern District of Oklahoma filed by Defendant Melton Truck Lines, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 7/26/2021 at 08:30 AM before Judge John A. Kronstadt. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Mark Dargel, #2 Exhibit B - Declaration of Melissa Stephan) (Eisen, Mark) [Transferred from California Central on 4/22/2021.]
March 19, 2021 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Mark S. Eisen on behalf of Defendant Melton Truck Lines, Inc. (Attorney Mark S. Eisen added to party Melton Truck Lines, Inc.(pty:dft))(Eisen, Mark) [Transferred from California Central on 4/22/2021.]
February 16, 2021 Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Monica Williams. upon Melton Truck Lines, Inc. waiver sent by Plaintiff on 2/16/2021, answer due 4/19/2021. Waiver of Service signed by Mark S. Eisen. (Kaufman, Rachel) [Transferred from California Central on 4/22/2021.]
January 31, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (tj) [Transferred from California Central on 4/22/2021.]
January 29, 2021 Filing 7 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Melton Truck Lines, Inc. (esa) [Transferred from California Central on 4/22/2021.]
January 29, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) [Transferred from California Central on 4/22/2021.]
January 29, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (esa) [Transferred from California Central on 4/22/2021.]
January 29, 2021 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Monica Williams, (Kaufman, Rachel) [Transferred from California Central on 4/22/2021.]
January 29, 2021 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Monica Williams. (Kaufman, Rachel) [Transferred from California Central on 4/22/2021.]
January 29, 2021 Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Monica Williams. (Kaufman, Rachel) [Transferred from California Central on 4/22/2021.]
January 29, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-30309057 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Monica Williams. (Attorney Rachel Kaufman added to party Monica Williams(pty:pla))(Kaufman, Rachel) [Transferred from California Central on 4/22/2021.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Monica Williams v. Melton Truck Lines, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Melton Truck Lines, Inc.
Represented By: Mark S. Eisen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Monica Williams
Represented By: Rachel Kaufman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?