Goulsby v. Dowling et al
| Clifford Lee Goulsby |
| Janet Dowling, Randy Harding, Aaron Peruskie, Lt Pryor, Tyler McInturf, Brian Plooster and Scott Crow |
| 4:2021cv00289 |
| July 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| Gregory K Frizzell |
| Susan E Huntsman |
| Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
***Remark: per order #6 , one blank civil rights complaint (form PRIS-14), marked amended and identified for Case No. 21-CV-0289-GKF-SH, along with instructions for completing the form mailed to Plaintiff Clifford Lee Goulsby #100814 129 CONNER RD HOMINY, OK 74035 (sc, Dpty Clk)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER by Judge Gregory K Frizzell (lah, Chambers)
|
|
Filing 5
FILING FEES Paid in Full by Clifford Lee Goulsby (ll, Dpty Clk)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER by Judge Gregory K Frizzell ; denying #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (lah, Chambers)
|
|
***Remark: 7 summons and 7 USM-285s in hold tray (Re: #1 Complaint ) (ll, Dpty Clk)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by Clifford Lee Goulsby (ll, Dpty Clk)
|
|
Filing 2
PRO SE APPEARANCE by Clifford Lee Goulsby (ll, Dpty Clk)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Clifford Lee Goulsby (ll, Dpty Clk)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
