Kolosha v. Pettigrew
Vitaly Kolosha |
Luke Pettigrew |
4:2021cv00354 |
August 30, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
John F Heil |
Christine D Little |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER by Chief Judge John F Heil, III ; directing court clerk to take action; denying #10 Motion for Leave to Appeal in Forma Pauperis (clb, Dpty Clk) |
***Remark: per dkt #11 a copy of order and a copy of Motion for Leave (dkt #10) sent to Vitaly Kolosha #603030 Joseph Harp Correctional Center PO BOX 548 LEXINGTON, OK 73051, and a copy of order sent to the US Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit regarding case no. 21-5073 (Re: #11 Order, Directing Court Clerk to Take Action, Ruling on Motion to Appeal in Forma Pauperis ) (lmt, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in Forma Pauperis (Re: #5 Notice of Appeal to Circuit Court ) by Vitaly Kolosha (ll, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 9 ORDER by Chief Judge John F Heil, III ; directing court clerk to take action; denying 6 Motion for Certificate of Appealability (pll, Dpty Clk) |
***Remark: per dkt #9 a copy of order was sent to 10th Circuit regarding 21-5073 (Re: #9 Order, Directing Court Clerk to Take Action, Ruling on Motion for Certificate of Appealability ) (lmt, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 8 APPEAL NUMBER INFORMATION from Circuit Court assigning Case Number 21-5073 (#5) (Re: #5 Notice of Appeal to Circuit Court ) (lmt, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 7 PRELIMINARY RECORD Sent to Circuit Court (Re: #5 Notice of Appeal to Circuit Court ) (With attachments) (ll, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Certificate of Appealability (submitted as dkt #5 ) (Re: #5 Notice of Appeal to Circuit Court ) by Vitaly Kolosha (lmt, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEAL to Circuit Court (Re: #3 Order, Denying Certificate of Appealability, Ruling on Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241/2254), #4 Judgment, Entering Judgment ) by Vitaly Kolosha (lmt, Dpty Clk) |
***Civil Case Terminated (see document number #4 ) (sc, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 4 JUDGMENT by Chief Judge John F Heil, III , entering judgment in favor of respondent against petitioner (terminates case) (pll, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 3 ORDER by Chief Judge John F Heil, III ; denying certificate of appealability; dismissing #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241/2254) (pll, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 2 FILING FEES Paid in Full by Vitaly Kolosha (bjb, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254 (styled as Petition for a 28 U.S.C. 2241 Habeas Corpus or 28 U.S.C. 1651) by Vitaly Kolosha (bjb, Dpty Clk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Kolosha v. Pettigrew | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Vitaly Kolosha | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Luke Pettigrew | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.