Rodriguez et al v. Parker
David Parker |
Alexander Rodriguez, Bryan Scott Murano, Robert Shea Watson and Colby Stacy |
4:2021cv00387 |
September 14, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
Susan E Huntsman |
Terence Kern |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 ORDER by Judge Terence Kern , directing court clerk to take action, terminating party Robert Shea Watson, Bryan Scott Murano and Colby Stacy (lmc, Chambers) |
***Remark: per dkt #2 one blank 28 U.S.C. 2241 petition for writ of habeas corpus (form AO-242), marked amended and identified for Case No. 21-CV0387-TCK-SH forwarded to Alexander Rodriguez, one blank motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (form AO-240) identified for Case No. 21-CV-0387-TCK-SH forwarded to Alexander Rodriguez, one blank 28 U.S.C. 2241 petition for writ of habeas corpus (form AO-242) forwarded to each petitioner who has been dismissed from this action, and one blank motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (form AO-240) forwarded to each petitioner who has been dismissed from this action (Re: #2 Order, Directing Court Clerk to Take Action, Adding/Terminating Party(ies) ) (lmt, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241 by Bryan Scott Murano, Alexander Rodriguez, Colby Stacy, Robert Shea Watson (blc, Dpty Clk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.